Hello again, all. Just to clarify what I meant on a couple of points.
By “industry standard,” I meant that FD is the thing pretty much every professional film student, screenwriter and producer uses – not that it’s of a quality to which all others should aspire.**
To be clear, you don’t need FD to make a movie. If they can make Apocalypse Now from a script generated in a hut in the Philippines on a portable Olivetti, you can make whatever you want with whatever you want. I’m just telling you what people who get paid to do what you want to do use.
The enormously gratifying news to anyone on a limited budget: if all you want to do is write a screenplay (and worry about FD later), Scrivener 2.0 is — pardon my French — fucking brilliant. I don’t see why anyone would use anything else at the initial*** writing stage.
I don’t have time to go into all of my thoughts on this now, but suffice to say that Scrivener conforms to virtually every “best practice” screenwriting approach you can think of. If you’re into Save The Cat Beat Sheets or Syd Field’s dramatic paradigm worksheet thingy or Robert McKee’s (insufferable) Story recommendations or just regular old Aristotle, Scrivener is an almost perfect tool. Because when it comes down to it, all of those approaches are about structure, and Scrivener is a structuring tool. But unlike software that guides you through a template, Scrivener lets you make your own, and lets you change it if it’s not working for you. Scrivener still requires you to do all the hard work of writing — it just puts everything in front of you and removes all the annoying stuff.
As for price differences, I liken it to Photoshop. There are lots of other applications that mimic some of PS’s core functionality – I use Acorn all the time – but if you’re working at an ad agency or design firm, you’re likely using Photoshop. It’s made to do the little things an amateur would never need to do, and it’s priced accordingly. I will tell you this: if the dread day comes when Final Draft makes Keith an offer he can’t refuse for Scrivener, they’re going to charge $300 for the functionality we’re enjoying today. And I’d probably pay it.
Edit to summarize: It occurs to me that, as a rule of thumb, buy Scrivener and worry about FD later. If you need to shell out $250, then you’re in a screenwriting program or on a production – a good problem to have.
[size=85]**Which is not to say that FD8 is not a high quality product; it is. After the train… wreck is not the right word. After the non-fatal derailment of 7.0, Final Draft has come back nicely.
***You don’t even need FD to properly format a spec — just be aware that there are margins and conventions people expect. Make sure that your compiled draft looks like it should. [/size]