18th Century Capitalization

PI
PINSKO
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 3:15 am
Platform: Mac
Location: Roscoe, IL
Contact:

Thu Dec 22, 2011 4:31 am Post

Howdy!

I've been reading through a lot of material from the Revolutionary War period and I'm puzzled by the capitalization common to the period. I can't identify the particular rules that determined how words were capitalized. I sense that some words were modified into proper nouns, perhaps assigning a degree of relative importance to them, but that's about as close as I can get to a discernible pattern. Punctuation also seems to have been used at the whim of the author rather than by adherence to a set of rules.

For example, here's a sentence quoted from John Ferling's excellent book Almost a Miracle:

If "his Majesty's Troops should not be molested during their Imbarkation or at their Departure," he would not put the torch to Boston.


Why were "Imbarkation" and "Departure" capitalized? Here is another example from the same book:

Yet another advised Washington, "no Friend of America can be an Enemy to you, for by God... there is not nor ever was in the world A man who Acted from more Laudable and disinterested motive than you do."


"Acted?" "Laudable?" "A?"

I have read that no less a writer than Thomas Jefferson (in addition to other notable contemporary writers) praised George Washington's writing for its correctness and readability, despite Washington's "defective education." To me, this suggests that the Founders' words we read today were penned in their correct form for the time, by educated and literate men. Ferling notes that he left the original quotes as they were written, without modernization or correction. Does anyone know about the rules of English usage at the time that would have defined how words were capitalized?


Cheers!
Patrick

User avatar
kewms
Posts: 3923
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:22 pm
Platform: Mac

Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:16 am Post

I thought this would be an easy question. Apparently it isn't, but this attempt is both useful and entertaining in its own right:
http://ask.metafilter.com/29691/What-is ... talization

Katherine
Scrivener Support Team

PI
PINSKO
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 3:15 am
Platform: Mac
Location: Roscoe, IL
Contact:

Fri Dec 23, 2011 2:48 am Post

Katherine,

That link is the perfect response to my question, and an entertaining read indeed! Thank you for your reply.


Regards,
Patrick

Gr
GrubStLodger
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:08 am
Platform: Mac

Sat May 05, 2012 7:45 am Post

I read a lot of eighteenth century books and it seems that capitalisation is largely a personal matter. Many modern editions standardise capitalisation, which I find a pity because the texts where they don't, I find I can get into the author's rhythms better.

User avatar
Merovech
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:54 am
Platform: Mac
Location: Virginia, USA
Contact:

Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:11 am Post

I would think it's because of the Germanic ties. In German, all nouns are capitalized. We may well have followed that pattern, either from influences of Reformation literature (largely Germanic) or the natural language affinity.

Just like once upon a time some verbs we use now with helping verbs used to not require them...

PI
PINSKO
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 3:15 am
Platform: Mac
Location: Roscoe, IL
Contact:

Fri Jun 27, 2014 4:42 am Post

Hello again,

I was reading our beloved Declaration of Independence from the Pocket Constitution booklet given to me by my congressman when I noticed a pattern to the capitalization of certain words. It appears the only words capitalized are the nouns. If you read through each sentence and diagram its parts of speech in your head, you can see that only those nouns that do not belong to one of the sentence's supporting clauses (i.e., those clauses represented on branches of the diagram's tree) are capitalized. Other parts of speech that are rendered into nouns through contortions of the English language apparently also escape the need to be capitalized.

I doubt this answers the original question wholesale, but I found the pattern sufficiently noteworthy to merit a description of my observation here for others who are similarly intrigued by this apparently nonsensical, lawless, Enlightenment-era mystery.

Kindly,
Patrick

User avatar
Merovech
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:54 am
Platform: Mac
Location: Virginia, USA
Contact:

Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:51 am Post

I recently cruised through a book on history of English. A big take away was a reminder that English grammar was not as standardized then. There was a big move in the 19th C to standardize. So, you can capitalize the way you'd like if you're mimicking 18thC grammar. YOLO.

PI
PINSKO
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 3:15 am
Platform: Mac
Location: Roscoe, IL
Contact:

Mon Jul 14, 2014 11:51 pm Post

Merovech,

Rock on. I shall do just that.

Kindly,
Patrick

User avatar
Jaysen
Posts: 5953
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:00 am
Platform: Mac + Windows
Location: East-Be-Jesus-Nowhere SC, USA

Wed Jul 16, 2014 11:28 am Post

With a limited sample set, I wonder if the caps were also to eliminate confusion in handwritten documents. Ex. The letter a can easily be mistaken for an o in lowercase form.

But I like the noun idea a bit better.
Jaysen

I have a wife and 2 kids that I can only attribute to a wiggle, a giggle, and the realization that she was out of my league so I might as well be happy with her as a friend. 24 years marriage later, I can't imagine life without her. -Me 10/7/09

Image

User avatar
vic-k
Posts: 7075
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:23 am
Platform: Mac + Windows
Location: Protesting in the nude, outside ex Red Lion TESCO Store

Wed Jul 16, 2014 2:05 pm Post

Some sound explanations to be had here, further down the page. http://britlitwiki.wikispaces.com/Eight ... y+Grammars
As a professional, you, are your one and only asset. Without integrity you are worthless, but with it, you are priceless.