Sun Nov 03, 2019 3:22 pm Post
Sun Nov 03, 2019 7:01 pm Post
Sun Nov 03, 2019 9:07 pm Post
Mon Nov 04, 2019 12:19 pm Post
tiho_d wrote:Please, read and follow my post above. It is about your topmost compile format editor window and not the main compile window.
Tue Nov 05, 2019 3:02 pm Post
Dorothea wrote:I mean this window,when I'min the compiler and want tochange someof the preset formatting,like seize or typeface of a header..
Fri Nov 08, 2019 11:26 am Post
tiho_d wrote:1920x1080 at 125% is definitely not a recommended resolution.
1920x1080 at 100% is.
Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:41 pm Post
rwfranz wrote:In the US, only ~20% of desktops have 1920x1080 screens. (https://gs.statcounter.com/screen-resol ... erica/2019).
Sat Nov 09, 2019 2:15 pm Post
tiho_d wrote:@rwfranz: For writing yes, for compiling and editing compile settings the screen height of 768px is not enough to fit all the options.
Sat Nov 09, 2019 2:28 pm Post
RJO wrote:rwfranz wrote:In the US, only ~20% of desktops have 1920x1080 screens. (https://gs.statcounter.com/screen-resol ... erica/2019).
1. Despite the graph's title, it conflates desktops AND laptops, which they are unable to distinguish. (This is from the site's FAQ.)
[stuff snipped]
Not arguing what L&L should or should not do for legacy equipment, just that the statistics cited prove little to nothing.
Sat Nov 09, 2019 6:26 pm Post
rwfranz wrote:tiho_d wrote:@rwfranz: For writing yes, for compiling and editing compile settings the screen height of 768px is not enough to fit all the options.
As usual, I found an acceptable workaround:
In total there are 5 users online :: 0 registered, 1 hidden and 4 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 1048 on Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:07 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests