Sat May 25, 2019 10:15 am Post
Sun May 26, 2019 7:52 am Post
Sun May 26, 2019 8:19 am Post
Sun May 26, 2019 10:48 am Post
austriaka wrote:Please try not to look through your eyes but with the eyes of somebody who wants to give the beta a first try. It looks like an old thread which isn't updated anymore.
Sun May 26, 2019 6:20 pm Post
Sun May 26, 2019 6:32 pm Post
rgletter wrote:There is only one beta for Windows. If your beta copy stops working then it is out of date. There is only one listed here in the beta area and its numbered (...17). Just because you want to stare down a date reference, does not make this confusing! I rather people post bugs here that actually helps the program then comfort labels.
Mon May 27, 2019 3:03 pm Post
Tue May 28, 2019 12:09 am Post
Collider wrote:I think this is a fair point, TBH. Speaking as someone who's been using the beta since its start and who is very conscious at all times of which version we're up to and how new it is, it's easy to forget that there are others out there -- either 'casual' beta users who don't pay attention to such things, or those looking to jump in and start testing -- who may not be aware, or have any reason to assume that the current version really is 'current', given the date and timestamps.
Add to this the fact that opening the beta just says 'this version will expire on [date]' and doesn't automatically specify what version number that is, and I can definitely see a good argument for including the release date alongside the version number in the thread title.
Tue May 28, 2019 10:20 am Post
devinganger wrote:Some people will disagree with me, but I would posit the opinion that if you're not prepared to do a *little* bit of learning and finding things out on your own, you probably should stay far away from beta software.
In total there are 6 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 5 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 1048 on Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:07 pm
Users browsing this forum: rwfranz and 5 guests