Wed May 02, 2018 8:38 pm Post
Thu May 03, 2018 7:14 am Post
TromboneAl wrote:The interface continues to be quirky and non-standard.
Fri May 04, 2018 7:36 am Post
devinganger wrote:TromboneAl wrote:The interface continues to be quirky and non-standard.
Well, it's not trying to be a native Windows program, so the design language is quirky to Windows users.
It's also perhaps a bit early to be making determinations based on UI when the program is still in beta. A lot of what you find quirky may be able to be softened up or eliminated once the major tasks of getting functionality in place are done.
Fri May 04, 2018 8:02 pm Post
TromboneAl wrote:My general impression from playing with the beta is that I would not upgrade to this new version.
I find the general look and feel much less appealing. Compare these:
Old.jpg
New.jpg
The interface continues to be quirky and non-standard.
Sat May 05, 2018 12:41 am Post
TromboneAl wrote:My general impression from playing with the beta is that I would not upgrade to this new version.
I find the general look and feel much less appealing. Compare these:
Old.jpg
New.jpg
The interface continues to be quirky and non-standard.
Sat May 05, 2018 1:10 am Post
Mon May 07, 2018 5:18 pm Post
Tue May 08, 2018 1:12 am Post
Tue May 08, 2018 2:52 am Post
Tue May 08, 2018 4:39 am Post
Tue May 08, 2018 6:32 am Post
Rithe wrote:Mac vs Windows versions - Remember, the Mac version has been in development for, 15 years (? can't find the correct number) while the Windows has been in development for the last 6. That is way more time to get things implemented into the Mac version. The code can't just be taken from the Mac version and transferred into Windows. It doesn't work that way. Everything had to be developed from scratch.
Tue May 08, 2018 7:32 am Post
TromboneAl wrote:I find the general look and feel much less appealing. Compare these:
Old.jpg
New.jpg
Tue May 08, 2018 5:56 pm Post
Tue May 08, 2018 6:22 pm Post
bcasan@gmail.com wrote:The further commentary since my post of yesterday simply confirms my decision to move past Scrivener.
If L&L are in the software business, then by definition, they are in a business. A drastically corrosive practice a business can engage in is to leave their clients in ongoing uncertainty on how and when to invest in the products the business offers..
People making business decisions expect either firm targets, or clearly stated estimates--accompanied by ongoing updates. I've seen no evidence to date that established the major targets for the successive betas. Please correct me if I'm in error. If I'm correct, that is unacceptable among S/W professionals.
The inderminate assertion that Scrivener 3 for Win will be released sometime in 2018 is not business information; it is a hedge offered by timid management.
In total there are 5 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 4 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 1048 on Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:07 pm
Users browsing this forum: devinganger and 4 guests