Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:07 pm Post
Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:45 pm Post
kewms wrote:There's an entire industry built around third-party documentation for Adobe products. That suggests that perhaps their documentation should be more comprehensive, not that Scrivener's should be less so.
Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:46 pm Post
Sun Feb 02, 2020 9:18 pm Post
Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:00 pm Post
Dreischock wrote:the author (who is also the developer)
Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:11 pm Post
Mon Feb 03, 2020 12:49 am Post
Mon Feb 03, 2020 2:22 am Post
lunk wrote:Your example is a very good example of the opposite of what you try to prove. It’s actually very smart to explain the design philosophy and the purpose of the various parts of Scrivener, not just the keyboard shortcuts or menu commands.
Mon Feb 03, 2020 6:55 am Post
scshrugged wrote:I don't think it stands you in good stead to criticize the accomplishment that it objectively is by calling it a bad manual.
Mon Feb 03, 2020 10:31 am Post
Dreischock wrote:To the member of Scrivener support team who said that the manual is not meant to be read cover to cover why then include it in the first place?
Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:31 am Post
Mon Feb 03, 2020 7:06 pm Post
Mon Feb 03, 2020 7:14 pm Post
Dreischock wrote: I read every manual of every application I use in order to get manufacturer's perspective and avoid unnecessary ambiguity in the future.
In total there are 2 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 1048 on Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:07 pm
Users browsing this forum: LuckyJack and 1 guest