Best way to get edits back into Scrivener?

Se
Selene
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 7:00 pm
Platform: Windows

Fri Jan 25, 2019 6:06 pm Post

So editors normally want a word document, where they'll make edits and comments using track changes. This works well with the compiler, but what's the best way to move the updated text back into Scrivener (once you have resolved all the track changes in Word)? Ideally I'd like some kind of import function that makes a snapshot of all text documents and then imports the corresponding text from the word document. It wouldn't need to handle structural changes, just copy/line edits. Is there a way to do this, or can someone recommend the best workaround for now?

Thanks!

St
StarDog2
Posts: 93
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2018 2:30 am
Platform: Windows

Fri Jan 25, 2019 6:48 pm Post

Maybe what is needed is a de-compiler!

Se
Selene
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 7:00 pm
Platform: Windows

Wed Jan 30, 2019 10:48 am Post

Does anyone have any tips? Manually pasting back hundreds of text blocks is really time-consuming...

Online
User avatar
krastev
Posts: 561
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:21 am
Platform: Windows
Contact:

Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:48 am Post

There is no easy way to import back from a Word document into the corresponding scrivener files.

For more info check: http://www.literatureandlatte.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30109

Regards,
M
Krastev
Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Scrivener for Windows Version 1.9.16.0
Testing Scrivener Beta for Windows

User avatar
kewms
Posts: 6962
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:22 pm
Platform: Mac

Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:49 pm Post

There are some features to facilitate this in Scrivener 3. See the information on inserting section links in proofing copies. I don't know if they've been implemented in the Windows beta yet, though.

Katherine
Scrivener Support Team

Ah
Ahab
Posts: 779
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: Maine

Thu Jan 31, 2019 11:16 am Post

Your mileage may vary, but because Word is the universal language of editors I've found it best to handle back-and-forth edits using Apple Pages (I gave up on Word some years ago). Pages handles marginal comments well enough, and does track changes well enough. Of course, if you have Word, it works just as well, maybe better.

When all the edits are completed and editorial is poised to transmit to production, I take that last edited copy as final (of course there'll be one more proofing stage after the ARCs go out), open it in Pages (or Word), open the pertinent Project in Scrivener, create a fresh Folder called Final, then chapter by chapter, I bring it back in. I don't need the granularity of scene-by-scene breakdowns. At this stage, they're irrelevant. Copying back 28 chapters took me 20 minutes, tops, with arthritic fingers on the trackpad.

Now everything is back in Scrivener, and if any final minor changes are needed before press, I can just plug them into this Final draft. Sure, it's not automated. But sometimes it seems as though we spend more time attempting to automatic every aspect of the writing life than we spend actually writing.

Ma
Major Major
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:52 pm
Platform: Windows
Location: Oakville, ON Canada

Thu Jan 31, 2019 2:51 pm Post

Not an especially useful reply in a Windows section of the forum.

User avatar
lunk
Posts: 4355
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 4:24 pm
Platform: Mac + iOS
Location: Sweden 64° N

Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:02 pm Post

Major Major wrote:Not an especially useful reply in a Windows section of the forum.

Why? Don’t you have Word in Windows? :shock:
I am a user, writing non-fiction and science, using:
* Mac Scrivener 3 on a Macbook 12”, MacBook Pro 13”, and iMac 27”, running different OS.
* iOS Scrivener 1 on an iPhone 11 Pro, iPad Air 9.7”, and iPad Pro 12.9”, all running the latest iOS

Ji
JimRac
Posts: 1722
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:06 pm
Platform: Win + iOS

Thu Jan 31, 2019 4:26 pm Post

Major Major wrote:Not an especially useful reply in a Windows section of the forum.
I assume you're referring to Ahab's reply? On the contrary, I found it quite useful.

Hopefully the OP does as well. As the OP's concern was "Manually pasting back hundreds of text blocks is really time-consuming...", IMHO Ahab's advice to stop working at that level of granularity and instead copy the text back into the project in bigger chunks (from Word or whatever other tool) is certainly something to consider. Particularly if the OP feels the book is at the point where no structural changes are needed, then Ahab's approach of reducing granularity is smart and practical, and frankly, something I will consider for my own work.

The only downside I can see is that compile would possibly need to be reconfigured, if further exports are necessary. In lieu of an automated import process, I'm thinking that's a pretty reasonable compromise.
I’m just a customer.

Ma
Major Major
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:52 pm
Platform: Windows
Location: Oakville, ON Canada

Thu Jan 31, 2019 6:27 pm Post

lunk wrote:
Major Major wrote:Not an especially useful reply in a Windows section of the forum.

Why? Don’t you have Word in Windows? :shock:


Yes, but not Apple Pages.

User avatar
lunk
Posts: 4355
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 4:24 pm
Platform: Mac + iOS
Location: Sweden 64° N

Thu Jan 31, 2019 8:46 pm Post

Ahab wrote:Of course, if you have Word, it works just as well, maybe better.

Major Major wrote:Not an especially useful reply in a Windows section of the forum.

Ahm... :roll:
I am a user, writing non-fiction and science, using:
* Mac Scrivener 3 on a Macbook 12”, MacBook Pro 13”, and iMac 27”, running different OS.
* iOS Scrivener 1 on an iPhone 11 Pro, iPad Air 9.7”, and iPad Pro 12.9”, all running the latest iOS

User avatar
devinganger
Posts: 2429
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:55 pm
Platform: Mac, Win + iOS
Location: Monroe, WA 98272
Contact:

Thu Jan 31, 2019 9:29 pm Post

Major Major wrote:
lunk wrote:
Major Major wrote:Not an especially useful reply in a Windows section of the forum.

Why? Don’t you have Word in Windows? :shock:


Yes, but not Apple Pages.


Luckily the post talked about using the same workflow in Pages OR Word, so it applies to Mac and Windows.
--
Devin L. Ganger
Not a L&L employee; opinions are those of my cat
Life has a way of moving you past wants and hopes

User avatar
kewms
Posts: 6962
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:22 pm
Platform: Mac

Fri Feb 01, 2019 6:08 am Post

Really, people?

Please chill.

Katherine
Scrivener Support Team

Se
Selene
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 7:00 pm
Platform: Windows

Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:35 am Post

Thanks everyone for chiming in! Yes, I imagine that for later edits it might be fine to lose the granularity, so I could go with chapters. I've got 40 of them, but better than hundreds of chunks :-) For beta reader feeback and developmental edits, the granularity is what makes Scrivener shine as I'm particularly working with structure and pacing. Looking forward to Scrivener 3 if it'll solve this!