Nisus now does comments

mi
michaelbywater
Posts: 276
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:02 pm

Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:55 pm Post

The public beta of Nisus Writer Pro 1.1 is now up on macupdate.com, and does comments, read and write on the Word - Scrivener - Nisus round trip. This is very good news -- comments, to me, are much more relevant than Track Changes for working with editors. I feel that Nisus is now overtaking Mellel for my purposes; multiple note streams I can live without, and the Outline feature in Mellel has been, of course, superseded by the Scrivener binder... I feel guilty about this, because I really loved it at one stage, but I feel Mellel may be moving towards desuetude in my rig.

User avatar
KB
Site Admin
Posts: 20737
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:23 pm
Platform: Mac
Location: Truro, Cornwall
Contact:

Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:12 am Post

And the annotations in Scrivener export very nicely to Nisus comments, too... (Using RTF.) I definitely think Scrivener and Nisus are a good fit.
Best,
Keith

User avatar
xiamenese
Posts: 4371
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 1:32 am
Platform: Mac
Location: London or Exeter, UK.

Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:48 am Post

Yes, the Scrivener-Nisus combination is brilliant. :D

The only way the bar could be raised higher for me is if it was possible for Nisus/Scrivener to read comments in Word docs (and docxs). That's largely down to the converter Nisus use, which Martin tells me they are looking to replace, so I don't know if/when it will become possible. I presume TextEdit, (hence Scrivener?) uses the same one without Nisus' tweaks.

In the meantime, I'll check-out the Commented-DOC --> NeoOffice to RTF --> Scrivener/Nisus to see how that works.

As for Mellel, as I've said in other threads, I had to give that up long ago for reasons of Chinese, but I'm sure most dedicated users will continue to do prefer it.

Mark
The Scrivenato sometimes known as Mr X.
iMac 27" (late 2015) 10.15.4, 24GB RAM, 512GB SSID
MBP17" (late 2011) 10.13.6, 16GB RAM, 2TB SSID
2017 iPad, iPadOS 13.3, 128GB, Apple Pencil
Scrivener, Scapple, Nisus Writer Pro, Bookends …

bo
bodsham
Posts: 187
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:21 pm Post

Having finished a new book in Scrivener I must, of course, deliver it in Word. I tried to finish the final revise in the new Word 2008. Well done, Microsoft. You've made a bad product worse - slow, unreliable, nasty all round. So I'm actually finishing the thing off in Pages which is working well - comment come through, plus the track changes works. True there's stuff on the screen I don't need such as footers and headers but at least it doesn't keep falling over and the global find (all instances in a document in a single view) is very useful too.

Shame Pages has no workable outlining, long document management function though.

User avatar
AndreasE
Posts: 737
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:33 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:44 pm Post

bodsham wrote:Shame Pages has no workable outlining, long document management function though.


Yes, and that it does not save itself. That's incredible these days.

But at least its beautiful. Surely the most beautiful textprocessor ever. :lol:

Bo
Boys of Summer
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:14 am
Location: Boston

Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:54 pm Post

Excuse me...

But what is the purpose of Nisus Writer and why does one need it if one has Scrivener?

H
"She watched him turn and walk out of the park, and she wondered about him all of the rest of the day, this strange man with the intense look, who stood in the middle of the park, in love with it."

User avatar
kewms
Posts: 6257
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:22 pm
Platform: Mac

Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:09 pm Post

Boys of Summer wrote:Excuse me...

But what is the purpose of Nisus Writer and why does one need it if one has Scrivener?

H


Every so often, someone will request a feature, and Keith will say, "That's a document layout and formatting feature. Scrivener doesn't do that, and won't."

That's when you need a dedicated word processor such as Nisus.

Common examples are complex footnotes, revision tracking, and table of contents/tables/figures generation, but there are plenty more.

I also wouldn't use Scrivener for invoicing or business correspondence, and it would likely need to be augmented for journal articles, theses, and other things with highly specific formatting requirements.

Katherine
Scrivener Support Team

Bo
Boys of Summer
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:14 am
Location: Boston

Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:18 pm Post

I see...

Thanks you you for your response!

H
"She watched him turn and walk out of the park, and she wondered about him all of the rest of the day, this strange man with the intense look, who stood in the middle of the park, in love with it."

su
suavito
Posts: 306
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:52 pm
Platform: Mac
Location: Germany

Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:39 pm Post

AndreasE wrote:But at least its beautiful. Surely the most beautiful textprocessor ever. :lol:

Not even that. I was shocked when I saw Pages' text rendering. I have never seen my beloved Bembo (PostScript font) looking that bad. Strangely enough also worse than in Apple's own TextEdit.

And what's with the tiny toolbar icons?

Nah.
Author’s Preface

I wrote this book in less than two hours. I think I’ve made as much of it as one could in such a short time.

Eugen Egner, Androids from Milk

bo
bodsham
Posts: 187
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:00 pm Post

I'm not sure any word processor looks 'beautiful' to me, or that I'd want it to. I just want the thing to work reliably and quickly. Pages does that for my purposes. I looked at the Nisus beta. The lack of a document-wide search function which reveals all instances of a word in the book makes it unsuitable for me - I take that for granted in Scrivener and Pages. But others might find this unimportant. It's interesting that we have a wealth of choices now on the Mac - it didn't use to be that way.

User avatar
valente.mac
Posts: 213
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:50 pm
Platform: Mac
Location: Algarve, Portugal

Mon Apr 21, 2008 10:26 pm Post

I'm actually very well impressed with Nisus WP and its comments in particular. It's friendly to the user, it has a good forum and it's developers listen to customers. In fact, I'm letting Pages (partially) and Mellel go: the first is not good for long files (although it's great for graphic ones, like flyers and posters) and the second is way too contra-intuitive for my taste.

It also imports wonderfully from Scrivener. :)

User avatar
xiamenese
Posts: 4371
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 1:32 am
Platform: Mac
Location: London or Exeter, UK.

Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:24 am Post

bodsham wrote:I looked at the Nisus beta. The lack of a document-wide search function which reveals all instances of a word in the book makes it unsuitable for me -

I can't imagine what makes you think that. Nisus has had that since way back ... there's a "Find All" button at the bottom of the Find dialog. I've just checked it using the Project Gutenberg version of Jane Eyre, 308 pages in the type settings I have as default. I searched for "Jane" ... it highlighted every example, including the times when Rochester calls her "Janet" as I didn't ask for complete word.
What's even greater about NWP/E is it has a full — I believe — implementation of GREP, in both a user-friendly version, known as PowerFind, and a code-based version, PowerFind Pro. I don't know any other ordinary word processor that gives you that search and replace capability.

Mark
The Scrivenato sometimes known as Mr X.
iMac 27" (late 2015) 10.15.4, 24GB RAM, 512GB SSID
MBP17" (late 2011) 10.13.6, 16GB RAM, 2TB SSID
2017 iPad, iPadOS 13.3, 128GB, Apple Pencil
Scrivener, Scapple, Nisus Writer Pro, Bookends …

bo
bodsham
Posts: 187
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:29 am Post

You still have to scroll through every one to find it in its position though. The global find in Scrivener and the Search panel in Pages shows you a separate panel with each instance in place so you can just go to everyone one without having to work your way through the document . Much, much quicker.

User avatar
valente.mac
Posts: 213
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:50 pm
Platform: Mac
Location: Algarve, Portugal

Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:48 am Post

For me it's a question of which kind of text we are dealing with. I think Pages has a beautiful interface, and for small projects is fine (although I tend to use Bean more in these... I just have a crush for Bean, I guess). It's also great for something more graphical. However, I don't think it's that good for an article or a thesis -- for these I'm having a very good experience with Nisus and, to a certain point, I also had a good experience with Mellel (alas, like I said, with a difficult workflow). I also have Word (I must, since I rely in Excel too much) but I never open it.

As for NWP search: it's not as fancy as Scriv or Pages, but it's quite enough for me. My main needs are different. :)

(Needless to say I have way too many text editors.)
Last edited by valente.mac on Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
xiamenese
Posts: 4371
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 1:32 am
Platform: Mac
Location: London or Exeter, UK.

Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:24 am Post

Mmm ... OK. I see what you mean in Pages. I've done the same search, but I have to say that for me, scrolling down that list is not really any quicker than scrolling down the text in NWP. And although pages contextualises the word in terms of the immediately preceding and following characters, I prefer the fuller contextualisation I get from seeing the word actually highlighted on the page.
It's horses for courses, of course, but I wouldn't give up the GREP possibility for what might arguably be a slicker interface.

Mark
The Scrivenato sometimes known as Mr X.
iMac 27" (late 2015) 10.15.4, 24GB RAM, 512GB SSID
MBP17" (late 2011) 10.13.6, 16GB RAM, 2TB SSID
2017 iPad, iPadOS 13.3, 128GB, Apple Pencil
Scrivener, Scapple, Nisus Writer Pro, Bookends …