Document Scanner Recommendations?

User avatar
MimeticMouton
Posts: 8963
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 5:39 am
Platform: Mac + Windows
Location: city of rain
Contact:

Tue May 26, 2015 5:21 am Post

I'm considering buying a document scanner, in hopes of ridding myself of boxes of papers that have accumulated over the years. Anyone have a recommendation for a small, convenient, reliable scanner? I'd prefer something that won't take too much space (already have a combo printer/fax/flatbed scanner and second printer cluttering the study) but there are a lot of options on Amazon. Since I hate reading reviews and trust you guys more ;) I'd love to hear thoughts from anyone who has experience with these.
Jennifer Hughes
(MM for short)

Br
Briar Kit
Posts: 1787
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 9:04 am
Platform: Mac

Tue May 26, 2015 6:58 am Post

Got a Canon LiDE...
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Canon-CanoScan- ... n+lide+210

It is okay for short print jobs of a few pages, but if you want to scan a lot of pages at one time, it is a slow and cumbersome pain. Previously had an HP sheetfed scanner which would do about 30 sheets at a time: load the scanner, press start, and job done a minute or two later.

The flatbed scanner is so slow, time-consuming, and tedious to use. Like you, we're digitising a lot of old documents: we should have bought a sheetfed scanner.

So my recommendation is don't buy a Canon LiDE flatbed if you have got a ton of papers that you could easily load into a feeder and scan far more easily with another machine. But if you wanted it as a scanner for books, photos, or odd pages once in a while, it would be a good buy.

Scanner Pro on the iPad can scan pages faster than the Canon.
https://appsto.re/gb/lva5t.i

Not suggesting SP as a scanning workhorse; just illustrating how agonisingly slow the flatbed is.

The HP scanner was also a printer. Don't remember the model number, but it was a great machine that produced very reliable scans...until it was dropped during a house move. :oops:
Account closed January 2017

User avatar
Cassady
Posts: 196
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:06 pm
Platform: Mac + iOS
Location: Sqornshellous

Tue May 26, 2015 7:52 am Post

FWIW - David Sparks and Katie Floyd (MaxPowerUsers podcast) swear by the Fujitsu Scansnap range. It's been coming on for many years now, and is highly regarded by all reviews, to the point of stating that once you buy one, it'll be the last one you'll need. They have one dedicated for books etc too.

It's pricey. But when I go that way, it's what I'll be getting. As an aside - they're both attorneys, and are used to having to deal with plenty of scanning. Just figured I'd mention it.

re
reepicheep
Posts: 509
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 5:11 pm
Platform: Mac + iOS

Tue May 26, 2015 10:18 am Post

I use my iPhone and either the TextGrabber or Scanner Pro apps. Much more convenient than using my (domestic) multi-function printer even if that has a USB port and a microSD slot that would allow me to scan images direct to storage media.

There was an interesting crowd funded project, featured on a recent episode of Channel 5's The Gadget Show, of a pocket scanner (slightly larger than a cigarette packet) that stitches pages together and then does OCR on the result.
Techie details in case I forget

Scrivener 3.1.3 (11945)
Mac OS X 10.13.6
Scrivener 1.1.5 (1301)
iOS 9.3.5/12.3.1

ro
rontarrant
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 1:30 pm
Platform: Windows

Tue May 26, 2015 11:26 am Post

This thread intrigued me, so I did a little research and found the link below. It's cheap and far faster than a scanner. It also has the benefit of not forcing you to cut the spine off your books (and if you look part-way down the page, there's a link to a PDF of the entire process of building this thing; ignore the PDF link at the top unless you want to "go pro"):

http://www.instructables.com/id/Bargain ... board-Box/

re
reepicheep
Posts: 509
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 5:11 pm
Platform: Mac + iOS

Tue May 26, 2015 11:46 am Post

Could go upmarket with http://www.diybookscanner.org/
Techie details in case I forget

Scrivener 3.1.3 (11945)
Mac OS X 10.13.6
Scrivener 1.1.5 (1301)
iOS 9.3.5/12.3.1

Hu
Hugh
Posts: 2444
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:05 pm
Platform: Mac
Location: UK

Tue May 26, 2015 3:13 pm Post

Jennifer, I can't recommend the Fujitsus Scansnap iX500 strongly enough.

Pros for scanning documents:

- it has a very fast, convenient, virtually error-free (in my experience) sheet-feeder for up to 50 sheets (I believe it uses some kind of ultrasonic technology to prevent paper jams: the contrast with its predecessor on my desk - one jam in about every five feeds on average for me, very boring indeed - has been dramatic);

- Mac and Windows scan-management software is included (not the best - I think ExactScan is better - but it's good enough);

- good OCR software is also bundled-in - to make your scans searchable (with this and Noodlesoft's Hazel app, you can set up your system so that your scanned files more or less file themselves);

- it's connectable to your computer via WiFi (though note it will only connect to a single machine in this way, not a network).

- there's helpful advice on the iX500 and other scanning matters at http://www.documentsnap.com (as far as I can remember there's a free guide there on using it).

Cons:

- cost;

- desk footprint (although this isn't huge) - it does have a couple of cheaper "brothers" with smaller desk footprints: the iX100 and the S1300i. But if you have a large quantity of documents to scan you could quickly find that fiddling with sheet-feeding using the cheaper models will become very tedious.

- the iX500 won't scan un-debound books. For this, you need at least to guillotine off the spines - or invest in a more complex and expensive device.

Hope this helps.
H
Last edited by Hugh on Wed Jun 17, 2015 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
'Listen, some quiet night, when you've shirked your work that day. Do you hear
that distant, almost inaudible clicking sound? That's one of your
competitors, working away in the night in
Paris or London or Erie, PA.'

ro
rontarrant
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 1:30 pm
Platform: Windows

Tue May 26, 2015 8:00 pm Post

reepicheep wrote:Could go upmarket with http://www.diybookscanner.org/

Is that the $495 one? I watched the video for that one and you still have to turn the pages yourself, so the one where you cut up a cardboard box seemed more practical. :)

User avatar
lunk
Posts: 4363
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 4:24 pm
Platform: Mac + iOS
Location: Sweden 64° N

Tue May 26, 2015 8:38 pm Post

Fujitsus Scansnap ix500 can easily be connected to Evernote, which is a good place to store and organise the stuff you scan...
I am a user, writing non-fiction and science, using:
* Mac Scrivener 3 on a Macbook 12”, MacBook Pro 13”, and iMac 27”, running different OS.
* iOS Scrivener 1 on an iPhone 11 Pro, iPad Air 9.7”, and iPad Pro 12.9”, all running the latest iOS

User avatar
MimeticMouton
Posts: 8963
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 5:39 am
Platform: Mac + Windows
Location: city of rain
Contact:

Sun May 31, 2015 1:57 am Post

Thank you all for the recommendations! The main concern is scanning old documents and pages of notes, so I don't think I need the magnificent DIY scanner yet (although of course now I want the time to try that project...but first I need to get rid of all the old papers so we'd have somewhere to build and store the thing). There's no worry about chopping up my books. I like my books with spines.

I'm about ready to click buy on the Fujitsus ScanSnap. That was the one that I remember coming up before in various threads, but of course the name escaped until it was said here. I knew you guys would come through for me. :) Quick question for those who've used it: do you find it works well with handwritten papers? I don't expect the OCR to work for that, but I'd like to get a decent image/PDF clear enough for me to read without it being so large I fill up the hard drive with just a few of them.*

Oh, another question, if anyone has experience: is it easy to switch between computers and platforms? It's not much of an issue either way, as in all likelihood once we decide on our filing system it won't change frequently, but assuming I get my act together, I'll have a bunch of stuff that I'll want to dump straight to my Mac, and there will be heaps of other stuff probably going to a storage drive by way of Windows.

* Probably an exaggeration, as HD sizes are increasing.**
** But then I've found my stuff always magically expands to fill the space.
Jennifer Hughes
(MM for short)

User avatar
lunk
Posts: 4363
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 4:24 pm
Platform: Mac + iOS
Location: Sweden 64° N

Sun May 31, 2015 8:48 am Post

MimeticMouton wrote:Quick question for those who've used it: do you find it works well with handwritten papers? I don't expect the OCR to work for that


Evernote can OCR handwritten text in picture files. :)
I am a user, writing non-fiction and science, using:
* Mac Scrivener 3 on a Macbook 12”, MacBook Pro 13”, and iMac 27”, running different OS.
* iOS Scrivener 1 on an iPhone 11 Pro, iPad Air 9.7”, and iPad Pro 12.9”, all running the latest iOS

re
reepicheep
Posts: 509
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 5:11 pm
Platform: Mac + iOS

Sun May 31, 2015 9:30 am Post

MimeticMouton wrote:… is it easy to switch between computers and platforms? It's not much of an issue either way, as in all likelihood once we decide on our filing system it won't change frequently, but assuming I get my act together, I'll have a bunch of stuff that I'll want to dump straight to my Mac, and there will be heaps of other stuff probably going to a storage drive by way of Windows.
If the Mac(s) and storage device are on the same network there are no real issues. Mac OS X can handle that straight out the box. Scan the network and connect to the device. If the device is attached to a Windows box share it out and proceed as above.
Techie details in case I forget

Scrivener 3.1.3 (11945)
Mac OS X 10.13.6
Scrivener 1.1.5 (1301)
iOS 9.3.5/12.3.1

User avatar
nom
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:02 am
Platform: Mac + iOS
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Sun May 31, 2015 10:52 am Post

You can't go wrong with ScanSnap. Lots of people/companies recommend them; people I know who own them, love them; I haven't read a bad review yet; I'd like one.

Having said that, I have an Epson multifunction with a sheet feeder and it works perfectly fine. I love being able to dump a pile of documents into the feeder, walk back to my computer and wirelessly scan them all to my desktop (or other folder of my choice).

You shouldn't have any issues with handwritten papers. The only problem I've had was scanning some notes from the early 70s that were on foolscap paper – slightly too long for my scanner to handle automatically.

Key point: make sure the scanner has a sheet feeder!
Complete and utter NOMsense.
Image

ex
exegete77
Posts: 264
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:57 pm
Platform: Mac

Sun May 31, 2015 3:02 pm Post

I have the ScanSnap i500 (two years). What an easy solution. The beauty of this scanner, it is dead simple and reliable. It changed my way of handling receipts so I never have to touch anything or mail anything.

When I have more than 10 minutes I have 30+ years of handwritten notes that I want to put through it. But I estimate it will be 2025 before I can do that. :D :lol:

Hu
Hugh
Posts: 2444
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:05 pm
Platform: Mac
Location: UK

Sun May 31, 2015 6:28 pm Post

MimeticMouton wrote:Thank you all for the recommendations! The main concern is scanning old documents and pages of notes, so I don't think I need the magnificent DIY scanner yet (although of course now I want the time to try that project...but first I need to get rid of all the old papers so we'd have somewhere to build and store the thing). There's no worry about chopping up my books. I like my books with spines.


Me too.

MimeticMouton wrote:I'm about ready to click buy on the Fujitsus ScanSnap. That was the one that I remember coming up before in various threads, but of course the name escaped until it was said here. I knew you guys would come through for me. :) Quick question for those who've used it: do you find it works well with handwritten papers?


I've used mine to file a large number of hand-written docs - still (as) legible (as my hand-writing ever has been).

MimeticMouton wrote:I don't expect the OCR to work for that, but I'd like to get a decent image/PDF clear enough for me to read without it being so large I fill up the hard drive with just a few of them.*


You do find that that if you have a lot of paper to scan, the megabytes mount up. But handwritten documents are really no greedier than printed text. You can keep the total down by measures such as scanning to black-and-white, and reducing the dots-per-inch count of the scan (but don't go below 300 dpi for printed text if you want to OCR the result). However, one thing to remember is that the ScanSnap is unlikely to be your last investment if you decide to scan a lot. To take the scans, you may want to invest in an external hard-disk, and the cost of backups - if you want to back up your scans - is likely to rise, however you do them.

MimeticMouton wrote:Oh, another question, if anyone has experience: is it easy to switch between computers and platforms? It's not much of an issue either way, as in all likelihood once we decide on our filing system it won't change frequently, but assuming I get my act together, I'll have a bunch of stuff that I'll want to dump straight to my Mac, and there will be heaps of other stuff probably going to a storage drive by way of Windows.


I've just checked the DVD-ROM that came with my iX500: it has both Windows and Mac software on it. And on the DocumentSnap site (see my previous post), I believe there's a recent contribution describing a relatively simple way to switch from one computer to another - although it is true to say that Fujitsu could have made this a lot easier. (With earlier ScanSnap models the absence of inter-operability used to be a recurrent point of criticism. To switch platforms, you had to download software from the Interweb, and do some hacks - or spend £400 to buy a new machine. No longer.)

As regards nom's point about the Epson - I believe there's a recent Epson model that could be regarded as a form of flattery of the ScanSnap... But I've never tried it.
'Listen, some quiet night, when you've shirked your work that day. Do you hear
that distant, almost inaudible clicking sound? That's one of your
competitors, working away in the night in
Paris or London or Erie, PA.'