Importing from Tinderbox

Mi
MichaelN
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:19 pm
Location: Chicago

Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:33 pm Post

Is there a good way to import notes from Tinderbox into Scrivener? I use Tinderbox for writing notes, organizing these into a structured outline, then adding text to the note body until I have a rough draft. Until now I have been pasting text from these notes into Word to write articles and books. Ideally what I would like to do is import the Tinderbox notes into a Scrivener project, either at the outline stage, so that I could take advantage of the different Tinderbox views for the development of structure, or a little later with some text already in the notes. It would be nice to be able to preserve the outline structure developed out of the notes from Tinderbox, then add to it and do the drafting in Scrivener. The best of both worlds!

Online
User avatar
KB
Site Admin
Posts: 19155
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:23 pm
Platform: Mac
Location: Truro, Cornwall
Contact:

Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:35 pm Post

Hopefully AmberV will field this one - I know she is a big fan of TN and uses that for brainstorming before bringing work into Scrivener.
Best,
Keith

User avatar
Gordon
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:06 pm
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:09 am Post

Tinderbox is very flexible in its output. At the very least, you can just use the built-in "plain text" export and move your data over using a simple text format. Have you tried using the File>Export As Text command in Tinderbox to see how close that is to what you want?

Mi
MichaelN
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:19 pm
Location: Chicago

Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:54 am Post

Thanks. I could do that, export a selection of notes from Tinderbox as text, then use “Split with selection as titleâ€

User avatar
AmberV
Posts: 20582
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 4:30 am
Platform: Mac + Linux
Location: Santiago de Compostela, Galiza
Contact:

Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:54 am Post

I would definitely recommend using the HTML exporter for this. While it is called HTML export, it is in reality much more flexible. The format is only what the template dictates it to be. You can use very simple templates like:

Code: Select all

^title
^text


And you'll get a bunch of text files, arranged in folders to match the Tinderbox outline, with a title on one line and then the content of the note. There are a few things to watch for. Set the default for the attribute HTMLMarkupText to false. This way you will not get <p> tags around paragraphs and so forth. You might also want to extend the length of HTMLMaxFilenameLength to 128 or so, and set HTMLExportExtension to txt, instead of html.

Once you get things exported the way you like it, you can just drag the folder that Tinderbox creates into Scrivener's Binder, and the outline structure will be retained.

If you did wish to retain formatting; if you used bold and italics in Tinderbox and you want to carry that over to Scrivener, then you probably should let it create very simple HTML files, and make sure to set Scrivener to convert HTML to rich text in preferences.
.:.
Ioa Petra'ka
“Whole sight, or all the rest is desolation.” —John Fowles

F4
F451
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:03 am

Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:11 am Post

Has anyone contacted Mark Bernstein about this matter? I too am a Tinderbox licensee.

My arsenal consists of:

Scrivener
Tinderbox
SOHO Notes

P.S. And I am not even a writer, but I am very much into processes.

User avatar
popcornflix
Posts: 203
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:18 pm
Location: Row 15 Seat 107

Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:17 am Post

Would someone please enlighten me re brainstorming with Tinderbox? I tried the demo, and it seemed like a more complex and inconvenient version of Stickies.

I used to use SOHO notes, but now use Yojimbo because it's faster.

I really am interested in learning why people swear by Tinderbox. Always looking for a new tool to unlock the imagination.

Thanks!
.:popcornFlix:.

F4
F451
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:03 am

Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:30 am Post

popcornflix wrote:I really am interested in learning why people swear by Tinderbox. Always looking for a new tool to unlock the imagination.

Tinderbox is more than an application—it is a means of thought. You must delve deep into Tinderbox to start to understand it process. It is rather like what the CREB protein is thought to be in the human brain—you can build long-term relationships.

User avatar
AmberV
Posts: 20582
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 4:30 am
Platform: Mac + Linux
Location: Santiago de Compostela, Galiza
Contact:

Thu Mar 08, 2007 1:55 pm Post

I had quite a lot to say about Tinderbox, here. Short answer to your question: I do not use it so much to brainstorm; I use it to keep track of every detail. Outside of a writing context, I've also used it to publish my web site, and as a massive, complicated to do list.
.:.
Ioa Petra'ka
“Whole sight, or all the rest is desolation.” —John Fowles

ho
howarth
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 3:53 am

Thu Mar 08, 2007 2:13 pm Post

I knew Jay Bolter a long time ago when he invented StorySpace, the ancestor of TinderBox. His ideas arose from using HyperCard, a single-card interface. Jay created a GUI that featured boxed spaces in which users could write notes, drag them into arrangements, and draw lines of relationship and sequence between them. It was a fascinating use of Mac technology, and initially it was free or inexpensive.

Later he sold it to Eastgate, and the price exploded. The product has improved, but I can't see paying $200 for any software under the sun. You may get many of the same effects from Inspiration ($69), and personally a combination of OmniOutliner and Scrivener is all the outlining or mind-mapping that I need.

User avatar
AmberV
Posts: 20582
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 4:30 am
Platform: Mac + Linux
Location: Santiago de Compostela, Galiza
Contact:

Thu Mar 08, 2007 2:26 pm Post

I've tried Inspiration, and while it is definitely a very good program, it does not have nearly the capacity for information processing that Tinderbox has. If you use Tinderbox for something along the lines of Inspiration, then it would be a rip off. However, its built-in logic language, template exports, and UNIX connectivity is something Inspiration cannot touch.
.:.
Ioa Petra'ka
“Whole sight, or all the rest is desolation.” —John Fowles

ti
tim
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:57 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Thu Mar 08, 2007 2:51 pm Post

Thanks for your posts and references, AmberV. I'm one of those folks who could never get into TB. As you point out in your posting on the other thread, TB's learning curve is long (and for me at least, steep). I just wasn't prepared to invest the time.

In addition, a personal predilection. It's so darned ugly. I mean ug-lee! For me, one of the great pleasures of Scriv is its attention to aesthetics. Maybe it's just me, but staring at that homely, design-challenged TB interface for more than a short while became truly irritating.

Again, AmberV, thanks for your knowledge and insight.

T
In theory, there's no difference
between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.

Yogi Berra

F4
F451
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:03 am

Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:06 am Post

tim wrote:In addition, a personal predilection. It's so darned ugly. I mean ug-lee!

T,

When you get to know about Tinderbox, you will learn it is not at all about the looks. I do agree with you, visually it is a letdown from the opening screen, but it is so powerful that you quickly forget about its looks.

User avatar
AmberV
Posts: 20582
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 4:30 am
Platform: Mac + Linux
Location: Santiago de Compostela, Galiza
Contact:

Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:36 pm Post

I feel the same way. Sure there are some obvious aesthetic things that could be improved, but much of what could be considered ugly is actually an expression of information. Given that the project is basically being created by one individual, I'd rather see him focus on refining and expanding the core functions of the application, than retooling the interface in subjective appearance directions. Remember, what looked good 10 years ago looks "bad" today; mostly for reasons of aesthetic fad. Appearance refinement does not advance in the way that other technological achievement does. While there is a clear advancement in the way of say, chip design, there is no real advancement in fashion or widget design.

Now, all of that changes when it comes to creative application (for me, anyway). For an application to be effective at allowing my creativity to flourish, it must not be jarring or cluttered. I have long stated that Tb never suited me at all as a creative interface. As a tool to help my creative mind be free? Absolutely, but to actually be a canvas upon which I can write? Not so much. When it comes to visualising information, though, it is excellent at that; it can "say" so much immediately. So it is really a matter of focus. It is vital that an application like Scrivener can be a canvas.

And this is of course different for every person. I have heard of people writing novels in Tinderbox. More power to them.
.:.
Ioa Petra'ka
“Whole sight, or all the rest is desolation.” —John Fowles

User avatar
Gordon
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:06 pm
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:07 pm Post

Tinderbox is hard on the eyes, and challenging to the mind of a new user, but totally unique and invaluable once you "grok" it. I've used it since v1.0 and there are nooks and crannies I still don't use or fully understand.

I've written dozens of articles, organized one commercial book, and tens of thousands of words on my professional blog, which is about to turn five years old, using Tinderbox. Clearly, I think it's a great tool.

If you think you might enjoy the product, but aren't quite sure, invest just a small amount and buy the book The Tinderbox Way. Read it, and you'll know if the product is for you.

That said, the last few things I've written have been completed using Scrivener. I don't see it as a Tinderbox competitor in any way, but its aesthetics are certainly quite enticing.