names for shapes

mi
mitchellm
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:10 pm

Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:32 pm Post

Scapple is working very nicely. In some cases what I'm doing is creating a group of notes, and then putting them all inside a magnetic background shape. All is fine within Scrivener.

However, I notice when I export as OPML, then import into another program, that the background shapes get imported as the "big category" (which is fine) but that each shape is just given a generic name (e.g. shape, shape1, etc.). It would be very nice for transfer purposes if the background shapes could be given a name in the Inspector. Seeing the name of the background might be nice in Scapple, but not really needed. However, it would help for clarity when going through the OPML export then import to other program process.

Possible for the future?

a6
a63rve
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:21 pm

Wed Apr 24, 2013 1:00 pm Post

+1
I think exporting OPML and naming shapes will be a very useful aspect to my workflow. Scapple is not a destination, Scrivener, OmniOutliner Pro, and Keynote are also part of my processes.

ma
matt99
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:52 pm
Platform: Mac

Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:41 pm Post

It would be very nice for transfer purposes if the background shapes could be given a name in the Inspector.


This would be very useful. Actually, I think it would be easier if you could drop a one line note on top of a shape and have that note become the row label during OPML export.

mi
mitchellm
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:10 pm

Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:04 pm Post

I'm hoping this will be fairly easy to implement as it's not really a new feature. Magnetic shapes are already named: just in a generic manner that we have no control over. But the naming and organizing functions are already there (i.e. all items inside a magnetic board are placed as sub-items in the exported OPML).

Being able to explicitly provide a name, and perhaps even make that name "visible" rather than "hidden" within Scapple would be two very nice tweaks to this hidden feature set.

User avatar
KB
Site Admin
Posts: 20499
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:23 pm
Platform: Mac
Location: Truro, Cornwall
Contact:

Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:44 pm Post

I'm not really sure about this. It would be a bit odd to have a "name" field in the inspector, and if there were one, then users would start asking for it to be displayed in the shapes, and then the names in the shapes would need to be directly editable, and... It's not really a place I want to go.

EDIT: Hmm, I wonder if this could be achieved by using the name of a note that is inside the shape but also linked to it...

Thanks and all the best,
Keith
"You can't waltz in here, use my toaster, and start spouting universal truths without qualification."

ni
nitram
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:56 am

Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:04 pm Post

I've been placing a note at the top of some shapes, to kind of label them. The note sits on the top edge of the shape, half in, half out. If there were a way of making this an explicit link...

ni
nitram
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:56 am

Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:48 am Post

Like this...
Attachments
shape labels.pdf
(68.56 KiB) Downloaded 139 times

mi
mitchellm
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:10 pm

Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:27 pm Post

Keith: I just read your edited response. Does this mean something might be possible?

EDIT: Hmm, I wonder if this could be achieved by using the name of a note that is inside the shape but also linked to it...


If this would work, that would be great. I understand your initial reluctuance, but since magnetic shapes already have hidden generic names given to them, there would seem to be a way to make this happen. In a lot of the work I do there's a phase where ideas/fragments are generated, but later a phase where I'd be looking for general categories (i.e. magnetic shapes) that the ideas would fall under. Being able to "name" those categories in Scapple would be very sweet (especially for OPML output where I'd send the work to be further refined/organized in other apps).

pe
peter100
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:43 pm
Platform: Mac + Windows

Tue Apr 22, 2014 5:51 am Post

I would also like the ability to name shapes for export to scrivener.

mv
mvg
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:11 pm
Platform: Mac

Mon Jan 01, 2018 2:21 pm Post

Bumping this ancient topic to say that I use the exact method Nitram uses to label background shapes. Now that connection labels are a thing, is there any chance y'all might reconsider the idea of background shape labels?