Sat Feb 11, 2017 5:12 am Post
Sat Feb 11, 2017 2:50 pm Post
Sat Feb 11, 2017 4:27 pm Post
Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:52 am Post
lunk wrote:It has to work that way. You can select different documents in the Binder that are not anywhere near each other and show them as one continuous piece of text in the Editor. The Binder is for manipulating documents and selecting what to show in the Editor. Not the other way around.
Tue Feb 14, 2017 7:10 am Post
Monster Truck wrote:An argument that it should work that way seems absurd. For now, at least there is a shortcut for that, but what kind of scenario warrants current behavior? In this case, if this lack of feature is intentional then it's simply a bad UX. :
Tue Feb 14, 2017 11:33 am Post
AmberV wrote:Automatically revealing (and hiding what has been revealed prior) in the Binder would completely change it from the tool it is right now into something else. That is perhaps where the divide is between those requesting it and those saying it would be annoying. The binder is designed to drive the editor, not the other way around. It is a top-end organisational tool and working space. The behaviour that is being proposed here would convert the binder from that sort of tool, into some kind of auxiliary feedback device like the Explorer sidebar in Windows, that just jumps around showing you whatever you clicked on—but is in itself because of that, somewhat useless as a work space because it is not persistent and only nominally drives the right side. Hence, any friction toward making that sort of change. You’re really asking for some of the core management features of Scrivener to be converted into a completely different sort of program.
Tue Feb 14, 2017 5:59 pm Post
Thu Feb 16, 2017 8:13 am Post
Thu Feb 16, 2017 12:43 pm Post
But from your extensive answer I gather that you are well aware of the issue.
But why wouldn’t it reflect the current document instantly?
And I never had this issue until my book advanced to the third draft, so I find myself increasingly multitasking between numerous sections making extensive edits all week long
Scrivener is extremely beautiful piece of software, very well thought out, and it would be a shame to alter anything fundamental, but I really don’t get it why it’s such a big deal. I can’t see it destroying the binder just improving it.
You can start by adding this feature silently, don’t activate it, just place it somewhere in the options for the rest of us, and see if it’s the end of the world
Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:08 am Post
AmberV wrote:Sometimes you just have to accept the software was designed differently from how you intended to use it, and your choice is to either find out how it was meant to be used and work with it, or you can go on pounding on the “workaround” all day and feeling uptight about it. I do either one myself, depending on how righteous I feel I am in my disagreement with the developers of X software (cough iTunes).
Fri Feb 17, 2017 4:02 pm Post
Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:27 pm Post
Can I suggest that someone video savvy from your team showcase the real power of Scrivener using your above described examples. The real life workflow.
Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:16 pm Post
AmberV wrote:But anyway, speaking of future versions, I need to get back to documenting it.
In total there are 2 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 2 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 1048 on Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:07 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests