Writing Software in NY Times

ho
howarth
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 3:53 am

Sat Jun 09, 2007 4:36 pm Post

A piece by Rachel Donadio, "Get With the Program," in today's NY Times describes how several established writers have used (gasp) software to write popular books. All are Windows programs and here's the breakdown:

Richard Powers: Mindjet MindManager and Microsoft OneNote.
Vikram Chandra: Microsoft Project and he recommends reading Franco Moretti, Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History (2005).
Marisha Pessi: Excel
Debra Galant: Dramatica Pro

Each of the writers had a previous life in programming or finance, which made them comfortable with using software in creative projects.

Story is at http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/10/books ... ref=slogin

No mention of Scrivener or the Mac, but what do they know?

bl
bluloo
Posts: 108
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:18 pm

Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:10 pm Post

The Times is generally Mac-friendly. I'm surprised there was no mention of the Mac or Mac-based writing tools. Of course that may be a function of the interviewees as well.

I find it difficult to believe that someone would torture themselves by writing an entire book in excel. I can barely stand to use it for data management at work.


Scrivener borders on genius really (don't let it go to your head, Phil ;) ).

Once it gains full applescript support there won't be much that can touch it, on either platform.

In time, I think it will go down as one of those pioneering/revolutionary applications in the tech/geek history books.

Thanks for the interesting link.

User avatar
KB
Site Admin
Posts: 19198
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:23 pm
Platform: Mac
Location: Truro, Cornwall
Contact:

Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:56 pm Post

Scrivener borders on genius really (don't let it go to your head, Phil).


Who hell Phil?

User avatar
AmberV
Posts: 20612
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 4:30 am
Platform: Mac + Linux
Location: Santiago de Compostela, Galiza
Contact:

Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:01 pm Post

Phil must be Kieth's bodyguard?
.:.
Ioa Petra'ka
“Whole sight, or all the rest is desolation.” —John Fowles

ti
tim
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:57 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:34 pm Post

Philip I of Castille, known as Philip (or Phil to his friends) the Handsome, great
grandson of Philip the Good. In between these two were Philip the OK and Philip the Nebish.
Phil I was the first Habsburg ruler of Spain and also the original author of Scrivener.
In theory, there's no difference
between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.

Yogi Berra

bl
bluloo
Posts: 108
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:18 pm

Sun Jun 10, 2007 3:04 am Post

KB wrote:
Scrivener borders on genius really (don't let it go to your head, Phil).


Who hell Phil?


D'OH!

Phil is the developer of Journler, whose site I was planning on visiting next.

I meant Keith, of course.

User avatar
KB
Site Admin
Posts: 19198
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:23 pm
Platform: Mac
Location: Truro, Cornwall
Contact:

Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:04 am Post

I preferred Tim's explanation. :)

sp
spinningdoc
Posts: 241
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:18 am

Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:37 am Post

[quote]By analyzing raw data and slicing it in different ways — temporally, geographically — you “discover unexpected things,â€

bl
bluloo
Posts: 108
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:18 pm

Mon Jun 11, 2007 7:52 pm Post

KB wrote:I preferred Tim's explanation. :)


Yeah, me too.

;)

User avatar
Amaru
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:50 am

Tue Jun 12, 2007 11:27 pm Post

tim wrote:Philip I of Castille, known as Philip (or Phil to his friends) the Handsome, great grandson of Philip the Good. In between these two were Philip the OK and Philip the Nebish. Phil I was the first Habsburg ruler of Spain and also the original author of Scrivener.

That explains Keith's breaks. When he say's he'll not be available is because he intends to cross the English Channel on his way to check in the Spanish archives for yet another of the many musings Phil I left on Scrivener--though his contemporaries though he was writing about an automaton that would write poetry on demand.