Cloud Atlas

de
derick
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:58 pm

Fri Aug 12, 2016 10:34 pm Post

I'm sure folks have seen this story....

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/ ... tudy-finds

I remember when I read the book ca. 2010 thinking that this must have been written in Scrivener....hard to imagine managing the interlocking stories without it.

User avatar
yosimiti
Posts: 590
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 5:56 am
Platform: Mac

Sat Aug 13, 2016 11:34 am Post

The movie was so lame!

User avatar
Sanguinius
Posts: 601
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:16 pm
Platform: Windows

Sat Aug 13, 2016 4:14 pm Post

yosimiti wrote:The movie was so lame!

That's because they had to cut almost half of it out to be releasable in theaters. Too many story lines had too many threads removed for them to make enough sense. And after Jupiter Ascending flopped no management people thought highly enough of the Wachowskis to allow them to release the 4-hour cut that was said to be far superior.

User avatar
yosimiti
Posts: 590
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 5:56 am
Platform: Mac

Sat Aug 13, 2016 4:24 pm Post

I think cloud atlas would have been better served under a limited series tv show treatment. It really is the best to adapt novels into screen via tv shows formatting. The technology is feasible.

Br
Briar Kit
Posts: 1788
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 9:04 am
Platform: Mac

Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:03 pm Post

Loved the film. Would like to see a four-hour cut of it.

Account closed January 2017

PJ
PJS
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:05 pm
Platform: Mac + Windows
Location: Upstate New York

Sat Aug 13, 2016 5:37 pm Post

Briar Kit wrote:Loved the film. Would like to see a four-hour cut of it.


I don't think four hours would be enough to do the novel justice.

ps
You can't conquer stupid — or cure it — with more stupid.

Br
Briar Kit
Posts: 1788
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 9:04 am
Platform: Mac

Sat Aug 13, 2016 6:48 pm Post

PJS wrote:
Briar Kit wrote:Loved the film. Would like to see a four-hour cut of it.


I don't think four hours would be enough to do the novel justice.

ps


I usually prefer books to the films they spawn. In the case of Cloud Atlas (and The Dressmaker, recently), I loved the film, but didn't enjoy the book.

Account closed January 2017

PJ
PJS
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:05 pm
Platform: Mac + Windows
Location: Upstate New York

Sat Aug 13, 2016 7:11 pm Post

Briar Kit wrote:I usually prefer books to the films they spawn.


As do I, and this was markedly the case with CA. But then, I read the book some while before seeing the movie, which may have influenced my taste for the movie — the two were, in my viewing, much different... hmm, "stories" doesn't quite fill the bill here. "Experiences" perhaps.

ps
You can't conquer stupid — or cure it — with more stupid.

User avatar
Sanguinius
Posts: 601
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:16 pm
Platform: Windows

Sat Aug 13, 2016 10:21 pm Post

PJS wrote:
Briar Kit wrote:Loved the film. Would like to see a four-hour cut of it.


I don't think four hours would be enough to do the novel justice.

ps

Nothing short of maybe a Netflix miniseries would do so, really, but it would still probably be better than the theatrical edition (and is, according to the sources I read). And I actually enjoyed the theatrical cut.

User avatar
Sanguinius
Posts: 601
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:16 pm
Platform: Windows

Sat Aug 13, 2016 10:23 pm Post

Briar Kit wrote:
PJS wrote:
Briar Kit wrote:Loved the film. Would like to see a four-hour cut of it.


I don't think four hours would be enough to do the novel justice.

ps


I usually prefer books to the films they spawn. In the case of Cloud Atlas (and The Dressmaker, recently), I loved the film, but didn't enjoy the book.


I think Fight Club might be the only movie I liked more than the book. I felt like more thought and effort went into the movie's creation than the book's, and the movie makes me think and feel more than the book does. I put the book down never wanting to read it again, but I've rewatched the movie more times than I can count.

User avatar
pigfender
Posts: 2565
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 10:25 am
Platform: Mac, Win + iOS
Location: I share a head with a great many personalities
Contact:

Sun Aug 14, 2016 8:12 am Post

Jurassic Park is a much better movie than a book!
http://www.pigfender.com/index.php/2013 ... ssic-park/
"Some dice only have sixes." nom, 19 Oct 2013
"Piggy, I'm beginning to wonder if you are the best person to take advice from." Jaysen, 26 Sept 2014

Image
http://www.pigfender.com | http://www.novelinaday.com

de
derick
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:58 pm

Tue Aug 16, 2016 6:01 am Post

Really you think so? Its been many years (read the book in hardback probably before the film rights had even been sold) but I remember being so disappointed with the dumbing-down of Jurassic Park as a film, then even more so when I got The Lost World and found it was written as a sequel to the movie rather than the book.

User avatar
pigfender
Posts: 2565
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 10:25 am
Platform: Mac, Win + iOS
Location: I share a head with a great many personalities
Contact:

Tue Aug 16, 2016 8:04 am Post

Spielberg had acquired the rights to the book before Crichton had even written it.

Yup, the movie is much better. The linked article in the above gives some examples of the reasons why.
"Some dice only have sixes." nom, 19 Oct 2013
"Piggy, I'm beginning to wonder if you are the best person to take advice from." Jaysen, 26 Sept 2014

Image
http://www.pigfender.com | http://www.novelinaday.com

User avatar
Sanguinius
Posts: 601
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:16 pm
Platform: Windows

Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:43 pm Post

pigfender wrote:Spielberg had acquired the rights to the book before Crichton had even written it.

Yup, the movie is much better. The linked article in the above gives some examples of the reasons why.

Are you allowed to use your own article as evidence proving your own argument? Seems a little iffy :)

User avatar
Jaysen
Posts: 5953
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:00 am
Platform: Mac + Windows
Location: East-Be-Jesus-Nowhere SC, USA

Tue Aug 16, 2016 5:55 pm Post

Sanguinius wrote:
pigfender wrote:Spielberg had acquired the rights to the book before Crichton had even written it.

Yup, the movie is much better. The linked article in the above gives some examples of the reasons why.

Are you allowed to use your own article as evidence proving your own argument? Seems a little iffy :)

Why not?
Jaysen

I have a wife and 2 kids that I can only attribute to a wiggle, a giggle, and the realization that she was out of my league so I might as well be happy with her as a friend. 24 years marriage later, I can't imagine life without her. -Me 10/7/09

Image