Rewriting Academic to Popular English Books

Do
DocLand
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2015 4:43 pm
Platform: Mac + Linux

Thu Nov 12, 2015 5:36 pm Post

I have done several academic theses and writings. I want to get the main themes in a public context for anyone to read. It means a complete rewrite of all the long, recursive, parochial and complex language of the academic world into some gripping form. Most thinking tend to be Germanic, philosophical and continental in style; I was told it was understood by avid uk readers but somewhat unusual English for us readers.
Aiming at the international English environment, what are the rules for non-fiction writing to such an audience. Does anyone have experience in this direction? Any suggestions will be welcomed.

User avatar
yosimiti
Posts: 590
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 5:56 am
Platform: Mac

Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:48 pm Post

I guess I'm going through a similar situation in that I'm going through law/grad school while at the same time am trying to write my first novel. So I guess I can be emphatic with those who struggle between having a formal, scholarly sometimes didactic academic voice, and having a 'commonplace' down-to-earth, novelesque voice that panders to the masses, and gratifies the literary soul.

My solution: try to develop one, single voice that satisfies both audiences. For me, I tried dividing my academic self from
my 'real' self, I found just too taxing, and I felt myself being pretentious of myself, if that makes any sense.

Anyways, my theory is that if you can develop a voice that can (a) be entertaining and (b) be intellectual, ultimately, you are hitting two birds with one stone).

User avatar
devinganger
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:55 pm
Platform: Mac, Win + iOS
Location: Monroe, WA 98272 (CN97au)
Contact:

Mon Aug 08, 2016 12:16 am Post

yosimiti wrote:having a 'commonplace' down-to-earth, novelesque voice that panders to the masses


Not having contempt for, or talking down to, your audience usually helps.
--
Devin L. Ganger, WA7DLG
Not a L&L employee; opinions are those of my cat
Winner "Best in Class", 2018 My First Supervillain Photo Shoot

Br
Briar Kit
Posts: 1788
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 9:04 am
Platform: Mac

Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:09 am Post

In my opinion…

- Know and respect your audience. Love them enough to challenge them at least a little

- Know your style (semi-academic, conversational, novelistic, etc)

- Read similar (successful) books and identify what you think works or doesn't work. Improve on the best examples that you find, but be true to yourself

- Avoid the temptation to shortcut the process by just editing the original works down, or copying blocks of text from the original works and joining them together with new linking passages…the final product will read as a rehash rather than as a distinct body of new writing

- Use the original texts as reference documents only; write the new publications from scratch to get a much cleaner, cohesive, and coherent voice. Substantive rewriting is a time-consuming task, especially when adapting texts for different audiences. Writing afresh usually saves time and delivers a better product

- A house converted into flats comes with compromises, as does a car converted into a truck, a church into an office, a hammer used as a screwdriver…people can always see the changes that have been made. IMO, write one work for one audience and a separate work for a second audience, even if the subject matter is the same

Account closed January 2017

User avatar
yosimiti
Posts: 590
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 5:56 am
Platform: Mac

Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:54 am Post

Yeah, I think I should revise what I wrote as I think it needs clarification.

Academic writing is fundamentally an intellectual endeavour, not an emotional one. It can get emotional for sure, but if you've been trained well through the rigours of academia, you've learned to convert your raw emotions into something that maintains emotional distance.

Traditional 'creative' writing -- a bit of a misdirection, I think considering everything is creative after all -- but creative writing, is a fundamentally emotional endeavour where intellectual musings -- they do come now and again -- come secondary; it's your soul that matters most above anything else.

I might sound officious in clarifying these two styles, but man, a lot of people struggle between these two worlds. I know I do.

I think with what you're doing, docland, you really got to find balance between these two extremes and just write in the most honest way you can, by being mindful of both worlds, and coming up with something that caters to both. There really is no simple solution I'm afraid.

User avatar
vic-k
Posts: 6945
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:23 am
Platform: Mac + Windows
Location: Protesting in the nude, outside ex Red Lion TESCO Store

Mon Aug 08, 2016 12:25 pm Post

Briar Kit wrote: a hammer used as a screwdriver…


This Imageis what we in the profession call a Welder's micrometer
Just sayin'
As a professional, you, are your one and only asset. Without integrity you are worthless, but with it, you are priceless.

User avatar
Jaysen
Posts: 5891
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:00 am
Platform: Mac + Windows
Location: East-Be-Jesus-Nowhere SC, USA

Mon Aug 08, 2016 12:36 pm Post

vic-k wrote:
Briar Kit wrote: a hammer used as a screwdriver…


This Imageis what we in the profession call a Welder's micrometer
Just sayin'

Works every time for me. never had a screw head stripped using the screw driver. And you get a nice recessed feel too.
Jaysen

I have a wife and 2 kids that I can only attribute to a wiggle, a giggle, and the realization that she was out of my league so I might as well be happy with her as a friend. 24 years marriage later, I can't imagine life without her. -Me 10/7/09

Image

User avatar
vic-k
Posts: 6945
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:23 am
Platform: Mac + Windows
Location: Protesting in the nude, outside ex Red Lion TESCO Store

Mon Aug 08, 2016 12:55 pm Post

On another plane altogether. From a über academic point of view, has anyone actually failed an exam for couching subject vernacular in old fashioned, straight forward, no nonsense English? UK or US.?
Vic.
As a professional, you, are your one and only asset. Without integrity you are worthless, but with it, you are priceless.

User avatar
yosimiti
Posts: 590
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 5:56 am
Platform: Mac

Mon Aug 08, 2016 1:25 pm Post

I think it's not really vocabulary that might fail you; it's an informal style that might, as some might find that insincere to whatever serious matter you are writing about on an exam.

User avatar
vic-k
Posts: 6945
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:23 am
Platform: Mac + Windows
Location: Protesting in the nude, outside ex Red Lion TESCO Store

Mon Aug 08, 2016 3:51 pm Post

vic-k wrote:couching *subject vernacular
... *as in language pertinent to the subject matter. Doesn't have to be full of brain-numbing legaleseistic, obfuscatory gobbledegook. Presentation done in **'...clear and concise English'.is surely a winner?
**quote from http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/campaigning/awards.html
As a professional, you, are your one and only asset. Without integrity you are worthless, but with it, you are priceless.

User avatar
yosimiti
Posts: 590
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 5:56 am
Platform: Mac

Mon Aug 08, 2016 4:31 pm Post

As always, Vic, you both confuse and amaze me.

User avatar
vic-k
Posts: 6945
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:23 am
Platform: Mac + Windows
Location: Protesting in the nude, outside ex Red Lion TESCO Store

Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:33 pm Post

yosimiti wrote:As always, Vic, you both confuse and amaze me.

I really would like to know, what it is that I've said that confuses and amazes you? :?
All I'm advocating is a plain, simple, straight forward presentation, wherever possible, of all the relevant theories, facts and figures etc., embodied within you thesis. Nor am I suggesting you mimmic my predilection for bastardisation of all accepted standards of syntax and grammar.
Vic
Last edited by vic-k on Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
As a professional, you, are your one and only asset. Without integrity you are worthless, but with it, you are priceless.

User avatar
lunk
Posts: 2463
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 4:24 pm
Platform: Mac + iOS
Location: Sweden 64° N

Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:44 pm Post

Hmm... I protest against the title of the post. It implies that academics are un-popular. :evil:

But apart from that, I support Briar Kit's post. You don't rewrite, you simply write something else, for a different audience. You can collect the scientific writing in the Redearch section, but then you have to start from scratch, creating a new outline, and writing a completely new text.

And to be honest, that's why you got Scrivener - to write! :D
I am a user, writing non-fiction and science, using:
* Mac Scrivener 3 on a Macbook 12”, MacBook Pro 13”, and iMac 27”, all running the latest MacOS
* iOS Scrivener 1 on an iPhone 8, iPad Air 9.7”, and iPad Pro 12.9”, all running the latest iOS

User avatar
vic-k
Posts: 6945
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:23 am
Platform: Mac + Windows
Location: Protesting in the nude, outside ex Red Lion TESCO Store

Mon Aug 08, 2016 7:07 pm Post

lunk wrote:have to start from scratch, creating a new outline, and writing a completely new text.

I think that's what Docland is proposing, isn't it?
DocLand wrote:It means a complete rewrite of all the long, recursive, parochial and complex language of the academic world into some gripping form.

I don't envy Docland, one little midge's didgy :shock:
Vic
As a professional, you, are your one and only asset. Without integrity you are worthless, but with it, you are priceless.

User avatar
lunk
Posts: 2463
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 4:24 pm
Platform: Mac + iOS
Location: Sweden 64° N

Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:09 pm Post

vic-k wrote:I think that's what Docland is proposing, isn't it?


Oh... Well... No. You can't re-write something if you haven't first written it, can you? He first has to write the popular thing, and then he can re-write it. Right?
You can't refurbish what's not furbished. You can't regard something you haven't previously garded, I think. :lol:
I am a user, writing non-fiction and science, using:
* Mac Scrivener 3 on a Macbook 12”, MacBook Pro 13”, and iMac 27”, all running the latest MacOS
* iOS Scrivener 1 on an iPhone 8, iPad Air 9.7”, and iPad Pro 12.9”, all running the latest iOS